Discussion Points are awarded for comments that Â· reflect that you have read the required text and readings Â· that you have prepared the discussion questions in advance Â· that you have thought about the content Â· that you have attempted to understand the readings Â· and that you are able to apply the content to “real life.” In other words, quality comments reflect effort, accuracy, and thoroughness. If you do not understand the material, you can still earn participation points by demonstrating that you have made an effort to understand the material and that you have read the text. Trying to struggle with and figure out the information merits points. I expect you to make posts that directly address all parts of the discussion questions as well as respond to others’ postings. Points awarded for responses to others’ postings will be awarded using the same criteria as original posts (see above, see syllabus).
You will not earn points for posts/replies that do not meet the above criteria or for posts/replies that simply reflect information from your personal life without incorporating specific concepts and understanding of the chapter.
Your reply should focus on enhancing your peerâ€™s discussion and not on the organization or if you enjoyed reading it. This can be mentioned but should not be the focus. Further, you will not earn points by simply stating that you agree or disagree with a classmate without fully supporting your opinion with concepts from the course material. Your peer response must enhance your peer’s post while incorporating concepts from the course material directly related to the discussion question.
Required: Two posts per chapter. Original posts must be a minimum of 400 words combined. (approx 200 words each).
Required: Two responses to peers’ posts per chapter. Peer responses must be a minimum of 125-150 words for each peer response.
Select two of the topics below to discuss. Inside your discussion always start by titling your post in bold using one of the topic titles below and then discuss your topic starting on the next line. You will then reply to two of your peers’ posts from either the same or different topic. On the top line of your peer responses write “reply to:” and then the title of the peers’ post to which you are responding. Start your peer response on the next line.
Complete 2 of the following 3 discussion topics.
Discussion A: Solomon Asch’s study on conformity
- Watch the video below and write an overview of the videos making sure to include a review of the concept of conformity and aspects of the studies that stood out to you.
Discussion B) Attribution and Fundamental attribution error
â€¢ Describe both an internal and external attribution.. Next, describe the two-step model of the fundamental attribution error and provide an example Lastly, provide an example of the self-serving bias (Do not use examples from the textbook, PowerPoint, module, etc.)
Discussion C) Bystander Effect
review the attached document) Lastly, watch the following video and discuss your impressions of the video and the idea of the bystander effect and diffusion of responsibility.
Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"
Also posted onJanuary 1, 1970 @ 12:00 am