the Explanation of Human Action Questions

I’m working on a philosophy writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

 

Answer the three questions

Question:

  1. Some causes for human actions are reasons; some causes for human actions are not reasons. Please give an example for each kind (you can use Rosenberg’s examples).
  2. To learn the beliefs of a person we need to employ [L]; to verify [L] we have to learn a person’s beliefs. This, according to Rosenberg, leads to a regress problem. Why can’t we learn the belief by simply asking a person “what’s your beliefs?”? Does this bypass [L]?
  3. Rosenberg suggests the possibility that no empirical evidence can falsify [L]. If so, which approach does Rosenberg think is in trouble? The naturalistic approach or the interpretational approach?
 
Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"