Value-Sensitive Design Approach Discussion
1 and 3-Hour
(One Page, Single Spaced, 12-Point Font)
Read Case NSPE No 98-9 Duty to report unsafe conditions/client request for secrecy NSPE No 98-9.pdf Download NSPE No 98-9.pdf
- For the Citicorp building, occupants weren’t forced to leave but they did not choose to stay either (in fact they weren’t aware that they had a choice at all). Is that okay with you? Do they have the right to know that building remediation is occurring?
- Do we as engineers have the right to act as paternalistic decision-makers over one’s safety? Do you see this as different than for example seatbelt or motorcycle helmet laws?
3-Hour (additional Homework)
(No page limit)
Read “Integrating ethics in design” by M.L. Cummings
Cummings2006_Article_IntegratingEthicsInDesignThrou.pdf
Download Cummings2006_Article_IntegratingEthicsInDesignThrou.pdf
- What sort of VSD product would you design and how would it function?
- Who would be the direct and indirect stakeholders?
- What are some of the conceptual issues (e.g., human welfare, ownership and property, privacy, bias, usability)?
- How would you modify the design of your product once considering the conceptual issues?
Reference Materials
- NSPE Case No 98-9 Duty to report unsafe conditions/client request for secrecy (Approved 1/22/99)
- Cummings, M.L. (2006). “Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 701-715.