Medical Surgical Nursing
Case Study Nursing Care Plan Weight: 40% Assessment due 20th May 2020 at 17.00 hours
Criteria | HD High Distinction | D Distinction | C Credit | P Pass | U Unsatisfactory |
Diagnosis Nursing diagnosis identified |
•Three accurate nursing diagnosis identified and comprehensive, correct expression provided |
•Three accurate nursing diagnosis identified and correctly expressed in detail |
•Three accurate nursing diagnosis identified and correctly expressed |
•Three accurate nursing diagnosis identified |
•Less than three accurate nursing diagnosis identified |
Actions Goal and nursing actions identified and described |
•A person-centred goal of care is identified in detail •3 appropriate nursing actions described comprehensively |
•A person-centred goal of care is identified in detail •3 appropriate nursing actions described in detail |
•A person-centred goal of care is identified. •3 appropriate nursing actions described. |
•A person-centred goal of care is identified. •2 -3 appropriate nursing actions described. |
•A person-centred goal of care is identified. •Less than 2 appropriate nursing actions described. |
Rationale Rationales identified and discussed |
•A clear and comprehensive rationale for each nursing action discussed in detail. |
•A clear rationale for each nursing action discussed in detail |
•A clear rationale for each nursing action discussed. |
•1-2 of the rationales for each nursing action are unclear and need more development. |
•Rationales for each nursing action are unclear and/or rationales for each nursing action are not discussed |
Evaluation Evaluation strategies identified and explained |
•Evaluation strategies to determine the effectiveness of nursing actions are comprehensively explained for each nursing action |
•Evaluation strategies to determine the effectiveness of nursing actions are explained in detail for each nursing action |
•Evaluation strategies to determine the effectiveness of nursing actions are explained for each nursing action |
•Evaluation strategies to determine the effectiveness of nursing actions are described but explanation needs more development. |
•Evaluation strategies to determine the effectiveness of nursing actions are unclear and not explained |
Medical Surgical Nursing 92438, 92454, 92450 Autumn 2020
Writing Writing is clear and coherent (including appropriate sentence structure, spelling and grammar). Evidence of in-text referencing |
•Writing is clear and coherent •Correct paraphrasing and referencing are evident. |
•Writing is clear and coherent •Correct paraphrasing and referencing are evident, minimal errors. |
•Writing is clear and coherent •Correct paraphrasing and referencing are evident, minimal errors. |
•Writing is clear and coherent •Correct paraphrasing and referencing are evident, some minor errors present. |
•Writing is unclear and requires development •Correct paraphrasing and referencing are not evident, multiple errors present. |
Referencing Evidence of in-text referencing and reference list provided |
•At least six different references are utilised, 4-5 high quality references •An accurate reference list is provided. |
•At least six different references are utilised, 3-4 high quality references •An accurate reference list is provided, minimal errors. |
•Six different references are utilised, 2-3 high quality references •An accurate reference list is provided, minimal errors. |
•Six different references are utilised, 1-2 high quality references • Reference list is accurate, some minor errors present. |
•Less than six different references are utilised •Reference list provided is not accurate, multiple errors present. |