Click on this link and read the Texas Supreme Court case of Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith, 307 S.W.3d 762 (Tex. 2010). Create a modified case brief of the case focusing on the arguments relating to “foreseeability” using this sample modified case brief OR you may, in no less than 200 words, explain the facts of the case and law on foreseeability in Texas based on this case.

 

Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

1. Write an original paper about some conceptual model, theory or theorist.
2. Your paper should:
   • Your critique must address and have the following Topics Headings:
     

     Topic	Description
     Meaning	Describe the main ideas of the theory (should include the assumptions under which the theory operates). What are the main concepts? What are the main relationships between the concepts? How do different concepts affect each other?
     Origins of the Theory	What was going on in the profession of nursing or in American society that may have influenced the theory? What values, theories, evidence, and/or existing knowledge did the theorist cite as support for the theory? What motivated the theorist to write the theory? What approach to theory development did the theorist use?
     Usefulness	How useful is this theory in practice? Is the theory practical and helpful to nursing? Does it contribute to understanding and predicting outcomes? Cite an example/case study where this theory could be used.
     Testability	How testable is this theory? Has this theory generated research? How many and what types of studies? Give one example of a study done using the theory What types of statements are the propositions?
     Overall Evaluation	Is the theory comprehensive and specific? How general is the theory? Summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the theory. Why would you use or not use this theory in your own advanced practice? (Begin to think about your presentation “Synthesis of Nursing Theory”).

 

Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

The Great Conversation 7th or 8th edition required

The purpose of this assignment is to assess your familiarity with the central ideas from the Age of Reason. In this comparison/contrast essay, choose ONE to the following questions to answer. Place one of the bold titles at the top of your essay. The prompts under each question are intended to guide your response. Use examples from the text readings to support your points.

Descartes & Hume

• compare & contrast them on some of the following;
  • What is Descartes aim in the Meditations and how does this differ for Hume?
  • What does each say about the origin and types of our ideas?
    • In Descartes consider the difference between Innate, Acquired, and Produced).
    • In Hume consider the distinction between impressions & ideas.
    • What does Hume mean by the Association of Ideas ( Resemblance, Contiguity , Cause & Effect)
  • Descartes employs radical doubt, Hume claims to be using experimental method. What is the difference between these two approaches.
  • What serves as Descartes criteria for suspension of ideas, how does Hume employ the Empirical Criterion of meaning for a similar suspension?
  • Explain the theory of Representation used by both and how it impacts what we can know?
  • How do they distinguish reason from experience, and give examples showing how & why this is important for both thinkers?
  • In the second Meditation Descartes arrives at his foundational principle or the cogito, compare this to Hume’s view of the Disappearing Self?
  • Consider Descartes causal proof for the existence of God in Meditation 3 or his ontological proofin Mediation 5? What kind of criticism would Hume give to the causal or ontological proof, and how would this involve Hume’s distinction between a relation of ideas and matters of fact?
  • Compare Descartes and Hume concerning our knowledge of the external world.
  • Explain Hume’s view of causation and his critique of necessary connection? How does this challenge Descartes whole philosophical program that relies and certain causal assumptions?
  • Compare & contrast Descartes to Hume regarding their views of human freedom

• RATIONALISM & EMPIRICISM

  • How do the Rationalist and Empiricist approach to knowledge differ?
  • You must give clear examples from their works.
  • What are some of the key terms associated with the rationalist & empiricists tradition.
    • for rationalist consider; a priori, innate ideas, coherence, necessity
    • for empiricist consider; a posteriori, sensation, correspondence, contingency
    • Choose two of the following to discuss: The Self, the External World, and God?

 

Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Reflective Essay

Task: Explain how the process of completing your research project has affected your understanding of an issue or event in society.

Length: At least 900-1000 words

Sources: No minimum number of sources. Cite any sources you use in APA format.

Due date and grading: This assignment is due by the end of Week 7. It is worth 10% of your course grade and will be graded with a rubric. To view the rubric, access the assignment from the Assignments area of the classroom.

Outcomes you should achieve by completing this assignment

• Organize information clearly in an explanatory essay (Course outcomes 1 and 2)
• Use an introduction paragraph with a thesis statement and a concluding paragraph to frame an essay (Course outcomes 1 and 2)
• Demonstrate accurate grammar and mechanics in writing (Course outcome 3)

Topic

You began your research project by reading an article from the news about a current issue or event in society. Your goal in this essay is to explain to your professor how the research and writing you have done for your research project changed your understanding of that issue or event. You will explain what changes occurred in your understanding andhow those changes occurred.

Here are some questions you can consider in developing ideas for your essay:

• What changes occurred in your understanding?
  • Do you know more about the issue/event now than you did before? (Probably!)
  • Do you look at the issue/event from a different perspective following your research?
  • Have you reconsidered opinions or assumptions that you held at the beginning of the semester?

• How did those changes occur?
  • Which sources from your research had the greatest effect on your understanding?
  • Did the process of writing about your topic affect the way you thought about it?
  • What role did interaction with your classmates and/or professor play in your understanding of your topic?

Organizing and supporting your essay

Your essay must include an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.

The introduction should gain your reader’s attention, orient the reader to your topic, and state your thesis.

The body of the essay should include focused body paragraphs in support of your thesis statement. There are various ways you might choose to organize information in the body of your essay. Here are some suggestions you can consider:

• You might focus each body paragraph on a step of the research process and how that step affected your understanding of the issue/event.
• You might focus each body paragraph on your understanding at a particular time relative to the research process (before, during, after).
• You might focus each body paragraph on a particular aspect of the issue/event and explain how your understanding of that aspect developed during your research.

The essay’s conclusion should answer the question “So what?” by placing the essay’s explanations into a larger context. To accomplish this, you can consider addressing one or more of these questions:

• Will your current understanding of your event/issue affect your future actions or decisions? If so, how?
• What lessons—about interpreting current events, about your field of study, about the research process—can be drawn from the experience of completing the research project?
• Is research of the sort done in WRTG 112 a worthwhile activity? Why or why not?

Point of view

First person (I/me/my) is appropriate in this assignment, but second person (you/your) should be avoided.

Formatting your assignment

Incorporate these elements of APA style:

• Use one-inch margins.
• Double space.
• Use an easy-to-read font between 10-point and 12-point.
• Include a title page with the title of your paper, your name, and the name of your school.

 

Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

I need help correcting my project in excel, I do have everything attached the equations are messed up.

 

Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"