Gambling in the United States

Jay Cohen’s conviction was not justified because he operated his business on a legitimate
license. His argument of his business operated entirely in Antigua could have been investigated
before being prisoned. Also, the Wire Act that was being argued against was framed before the
existence of the internet. Therefore, the conviction was not justified.

Gambling in the United States

I concur with the dispute settlement decisions in the world Trade Organization that the
U.S has the responsibility of protecting its laws. However, they could have done an investigation
to understand whether Cohen received betting money from other states. I concur with the panel
report that favored Antigua. The report has an analysis that illustrates that the panel did a deep
investigation. The panel managed to see the insufficiency and the many loopholes in the U.S
laws. Appellate decision was right in finding out that the United States violated the GATS treaty.
This treaty requires the U.S to offer equal access for foreign operators. The U.S allowed the
domestic companies to receive bets online while they denied the foreign operators. I disagree
with the arbitration ruling that allows violation of international trade laws.

Gambling in the United States

The Antigua and Barbuda did not have the right to retaliate against the United States in
an illegal manner. Importing copyright and entertainment material is not a bad precedent. As the
Antigua and Barbuda open a new form of trade, where the United States can also import their
copyrighted materials to foreign countries.

Gambling in the United States
The United States had better alternatives instead of abrogating its commitment to
gambling services under GAT. It could have created better laws that are inclusive of the foreign
operators. The internal laws should be reviewed to correspond with the international concerns of

gambling. The dispute between the United States and Antigua and Barbuda can be resolved by
having reforms that will work for the gambling market both local and internationally.
I do support the consumer protection because the intention of the regulations seeks the
welfare of the public. The Enforcement Act are seeking to stop most but not all gambling. I do
not support the enforcement act because it might be inflexible for most people. The internet
gambling Regulation are not clear on their statements. Additionally, they are not applicable in
some cases because of their ambiguousness.

Gambling in the United States
The United States gambling laws are governed by three sets of laws. The current state
and federal laws on gambling are not optimal. The laws such as the Interstate Wire Act does not
prosecute individuals but groups that are involved in gambling businesses. Other laws such as
UIGEA have numerous loopholes that allow people to continue practicing online gaming.

Gambling in the United States
Therefore, the federal and state government should move to permissive legislation that allow
gambling. The government should have market-regulatory models that allow free market with
limitations.

 

Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"