he US Supreme Court decision in 2012 led to the birth of groups known as Super Pacs.
They may raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions, associations and individuals, then spend unlimited sums to overtly advocate for or against political candidates. Although they are required to disclose the donors, technical loopholes allow them to postpone the disclosure until after the elections.
Some people consider this victory free speech. Others consider this too much influence of money on politics. Which view is closer to yours and why?